I will send you want you need to do, professor wants us to reply to two classmates I will send you what they said in their discussion..

The reply to someone else, which should be at least one well-developed paragraph long, . If you need a reminder of the grading standards, please see the rubric by clicking the three vertical dots in the upper righthand corner of this assignment.

rubric is below

Discussion Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Development of Responseview longer description	5 ptsResponse is at least two well-developed paragraphs, with specific examples.4 ptsResponse is at least two paragraphs, though it might need additional development to support some points.3 ptsResponse is one well-developed paragraph or response fails to bring in sufficient evidence to support its points.2 ptsResponse is brief, with little explanation or evidence.1 ptsThere is no response or it was posted after Sunday.	/ 5 pts
Development of Replyview longer description	5 ptsReply is at least one very well developed paragraph, with a central point and specific evidence.4 ptsReply is at least one well-developed paragraph, with some evidence presented for a central point but not enough to fully explain or prove the claims.3 ptsReply is one paragraph or less. There is a central point, but the evidence for it is lacking or is in generalities.2 ptsReply is less than one paragraph or is composed of claims with no specific evidence.1 ptsThere is no reply or it was posted after Sunday.	/ 5 pts
Accuracy of Responseview longer description	5 ptsAll statements made are accurate for the literary work and the class concepts. Literary terminology is used correctly. The response directly addresses the discussion question.4 ptsThe response is acccurate for the literary work with perhaps one small misunderstanding. It uses a class concept in a slighty incorrect way. It does not use literary terminology completely correctly. Everything in the response is relevant to the discussion question.3 ptsSome statements made are incorrect for the literary work or misapply the literary concepts, showing a misunderstanding of these. Literary terminology is used incorrectly or is not used when appropriate. Parts of the response don't address the discussion question or parts of the discussion question were left out.2 ptsResponse is off the topic or makes inaccurate statements about the literary work.1 ptsThere is no response or it was posted after Sunday.	/ 5 pts
Originality of Replyview longer description	5 ptsThe reply brings in perceptive comments that advance the class discussion in new ways, such as by noting alternative interpretations or new evidence.4 ptsReply brings in new ideas that advance the class discussion but are not strikingly original.3 ptsReply brings in new views but does not connect this well with the ideas in the original response it replies to. Reply might focus primarily on praising the original post or agreeing by simply substituting new words for the original concepts.2 ptsReply praises the original or agrees with it without bringing in new perceptions that advance the class understanding.1 ptsThere is no reply or it was posted after Sunday.	/ 5 pts
Writing Correctnessview longer description	5 ptsThere are no distracting errors.4 ptsThere are a few noticeable errors, but these don't impede the clarity or distract from the content.3 ptsThe postings are understandable, but there are significant errors or many minor errors, thus taking attention away from the content.2 ptsThe errors in the paper make it hard to read.1 ptsThe errors in the postings make it impossible to figure out some of the claims.