In his article, “Parable of the Sadhu,” Bowen McCoy confronts decisions that raise the issue of the ethical treatment of strangers; what groups owe to their members; and what corporate leaders owe those who work under them. 

One of the conclusions McCoy draws from his experience is that,

Individuals who operate from a thoughtful set of personal values provide the foundation for a corporate culture.  A corporate tradition that encourages freedom of inquiry, supports personal values, and reinforces a focused sense of directions can fulfill the need to combine individuality with prosperity and success of the group. . . . The individual requires and deserves the support of the group (McCoy, 1997, p. 7).
Do you believe this is the real lesson of the parable of the sadhu? Do you believe this conclusion [as stated in the last sentence of the quotations] is also the one required by the ethical theory of utilitarianism, as explained in the "Crash Course" video?  Explain why or why not.