Strengths and Weaknesses of the Quantitative Research Study Title: The Impact of Activity Mediation on Diminishing the Fall Hazard in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

 

Ethical Implications

Healthcare research must take ethics seriously in order to protect participant rights, safety, and wellbeing. The ethical implications of this analysis of existing publications include assuring fair access to safe interventions and adhering to the Belmont principles of respect, beneficence, and justice, even though informed consent is not applicable in this case (Bauer et al., 2021).

Significance of the Research Problem

The quantitative study tackles falls in the elderly population, a serious issue because of the way they affect both the economy and health. Every year, almost 30% of people over 65 fall, which leads to significant medical expenses. The research offers evidence-based methods that healthcare providers may incorporate into protocols to improve the quality of life for elderly patients (Nassaji, 2020).

Evaluation of Quantitative Study

A quantitative study demonstrates the efficacy of exercise therapies, which helps guide judgments regarding elderly patients. Fall-related injuries can be avoided on a physical and psychological level by incorporating evidence-based practices into healthcare programs. However, by contrasting the suggested intervention with alternative fall prevention techniques and taking patient viewpoints and financial considerations into account, the study might be improved (Sebele-Mpofu, 2020).

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Qualitative Research Study

Title: Utilize It or Lose It: A Qualitative Exploration of the Promotion of Active Aging in Older Adults

This qualitative study uses theme analysis of in-person interviews to investigate physical activity among older persons. A thorough analysis of physical activity levels, an investigation of advantages, obstacles, and enablers, and the utilization of technology are among the strengths (Eldh et al., 2020). The lack of an examination of the economic impact, a tiny focus group, and a restricted geographic reach are among the limitations, though.

Ethical Implications

The informed consent and ethical approval for the qualitative study ensured that participants had the choice to withdraw and that safeguards against discomfort were in place (Morgan, 2022). The study tackles language diversity-related ethical issues with adults who speak English.

Significance of the Research Problem

Age-related physical inactivity is a global health hazard that affects chronic illnesses and general well-being. Although the research offers insightful information, it would be more significant to examine the economic effects and resource accessibility (O’Connor & Joffe, 2020).

 

Research analyses, both quantitative and qualitative, are essential for thoroughly analyzing research difficulties. These methods provide insightful information about older patients’ falls and physical inactivity. The critique stresses the need for varied techniques to address these challenges and emphasizes the ethical considerations inherent in healthcare research.

References

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2: Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM – Population Health, 14(1), 100–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2: Eldh, A. C., Årestedt, L., & Berterö, C. (2020). Quotations in qualitative studies: Reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(19), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920969268

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2: Kreshpaj, B., Orellana, C., Burström, B., Davis, L., Hemmingsson, T., Johansson, G., Kjellberg, K., Jonsson, J., Wegman, D. H., & Bodin, T. (2020). What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 46(3), 235–247. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27004193

Order Now